Dogosh

Please give your time for a moment saw this site: Komisiprima
In KomisiPrima.com you will get the production billions rupiah without must work hard!
Only by small Investment that is Rp.170.000/ID the amount of your investment will eventually be returned after the contract period was finished KomisiPrima.com Menggunakan the certain automatic system will take you to a millionaire!

The survey has been proved, so many brands that had awareness high and high product quality evidently felt when disputing in the shelf outlet. More than 30% the Housewife still has not bought the brand that had been recorded and planned, afterwards changed to the other brand because of being affected by display, was promised the gift, the discount, sales girl and the others program promo.
If that has determined the brand, could change. Then did not surprise if more than 70%, they that in no way recorded items and the brand that will be bought will really depend with what was seen and offered in outlet.
The brand of the Toothbrush, Sauces, Detergen, Ketchup, etc. including the category of the product that really easy to change. Multivitamins, toothpaste, Soap , Perfume, Shampoo had quite strong loyalty, but could change.
So, as the marketer did not have felt satisfied with what was received at this time. Evidently still many gaps that could be used by the competitor to "steal" your consumer. Any Comment?
Possibly this one of the effects from Hypnosys Selling, where customer bought no longer was based by consideration of well thought out logic, but was affected with bargaining for a moment and time to break then not so many. So as customer did not yet have time to think clearly. Moreover to the product bought , was not the product that irreplaceable, so as to alternate the product in fact was not as influential with the quality of life.
its true. Now if wanting shopping to be enough to write anything that wanted to be bought, not brand. Except that has become generic, such as 'super-mop', 'molto'. In fact arrived in Mall that was bought brand anything that important had the promotion..
Now the world is topsy-turvy. Retail modern its so tough to controlled the market and supplier. For that felt himself expert to sell or the marketing, if meeting retail modern must change to purchasing. Because in fact they that became the seller not we. They sold "space" to us. We wanted bought they "space" to display our thing. 3 months your things not sold, must be withdrawn. Therefore that went up to retail modern and no longer the salesman or marketing but Manager's account/the Executive (AE). AE must be faced with the name of Merchandising Manager or Category Manager from retail that was relevant. Besides happening bargained trading the difficult term, Manager's account must design the promotion program together, arranged display in that category and until planned business review periodically.
In fact after got the good place, both in the gondola and in the middle of the shelf (Eye Level), the things possibly was sold but profit of zero because already blew up retail through trading the term. But continue to this place was contested because of becoming a kind of investment or the "advertisement", that stayed cheaper than the pair of the advertisement in the TV.
In the process of buying product, there were 3 stages that must be passed through. According to the classic theory of Fishbein and Ajzen that showed.

• Firstly, the product must has been in the consumer's cognition, or normally was measured with TOM (Top Of Mind).
• Secondly, the intention or the wish. The process of lightning in our head became the hole in the process of the purchase of the product, because indeed our person did not have the process of planning in the purchase, but also impulsive.
• Thirdly, the behaviour of the purchase personally.

If so just appropriate many big products that could fall. The challenger's product that was playing in display outlet will win. Because of the clever product will attack in the lack hole of the intention to the consumer in planning bought the certain product.
Moreover, our community pretending the expenses recreation as prepared the budget more when shopping. Not like that the relatives? As the illustration certainly if we go to Dufan were not possible only prepared 100,000 for the admission ticket and ate. Who knew later that we was bought starbucks inside? The brand that could displaying good product had a big opportunity won that budget more . the name purchase of the addition, attempted, and did not planning (again and again). To market leader not the guarantee for this behaviour to bought .
In sum, to be able to win in retail big, brand certain could make display they as creatively as possible so that could skidd in the process of the purchase of the product and pointed to the behaviour of the purchase. The example like mizone placed their SPG in Carrefour corners, and display their product so good. They Market share ever could collapse, slowly rose again.
But will be different if we playing in small retail, wanted the consumer have or not the intention bought also, then the big possibility of him taking the product market leader. So if wanting the focus in retail small, often played in ATL, the TOM could be fast big. Like extra joss. might not display very pompous, equal enough. Want to win in retail big and small? Do it both. right?

I really was attracted with my colleague's statement from Senior Partner Qxxxtxm Consulting in the Marketing Magazine the edition last July. he said that to determined the perception of the consumer was producer and marketer. Therefore, most important not value but perceived value. Not Quality but perceived quality. And He added, nothing guarantee the drinking water in the package that was expensive more hygienic than was cheap, or the reverse. But that important is the perception of consumer.
Aqua its quite relative more expensive compared with the other brand. There was also Sparkling Water, water was increased gas carbonites, that many times over price. In the five star Hotel, for one bottle must pay 40,000. In fact possibly this product of cost price around 1500. so, that’s the perception he said.
its so Interesting.
I want to underline the words “Not Quality but Perceived Quality”. Possibly colleagues often met the producer of the owner brand. They were also certain confused with the strength of the perception. They be sure that they brand more better in the matter of the quality and in the matter of used technology, but why the consumer still used other brand ? And, the lay consumer then brave claimed if brand competitor more better although without carrying out the testing before. Our community, was enough heard from 2-3 mouths, then they will become the fourth mouth that guaranteed the quality of a brand. Once more its very interesting!!
Possibly if being asked by the Lubricant brand, the Baterai Stone brand, and the Deterjen Soap brand that was most quality and most durable? Possibly this answer will be different from results of the test clinically (the Lab Test) that was carried out by the researchers.
If might tell about repeated results of the test that was carried out by the Consumer's Indonesian agency (YLKI) a few time ago. at that time, any 6 brand of detergent to be test. 1st test that 6 school clothes were white was smeared with broth rendang then in washed used the washing machine with the same brand. The six dirty clothes that were smeared rendang earlier was washed at the same time with same washing machine with used difference detergent. The test results showed that RINSO, was not cleanest. And the brand of Swallow detergent occupied the first place.
So, the test results had been announced. But, still to the strong perception people that RINSO cleaned most cleanest. And, whatever had the consumer who wanted to buy the Swallow brand, although with the cheaper price. He said had the price, there was the quality...... why could like that?
other test results proved that brand of the DURACELL battery could remain continued to be on after being put into the temperature of the backward extreme 20 degree for two days. But the consumer, continue to believed 100% if ENERGIZER was the brand of the most strong and durable battery. Even, the test model was blamed... why must be tested in the cold temperature, the battery used them in the tropical area. It was confused...!!
So, Perceived Quality evidently could overcome Real Quality.
In this problem indeed would many opinions were different, like the other opinion that Perceived quality and Real quality must go both of them, because of paying attention to Perceived quality continue to and neglected Real quality will result in robbed. Now many product market shares that only relied perceived quality began was undermined by good quality product although the development of image was still barely adequate.
see The easiest example of Operating System Windows had Perceived quality very good, gradually began in shifted OS Linux continued to tidy up in real quality. Now many users windows began to think Why not to linux it was free with same facilities or even better than windows?" . Especially the academic circle (the student) that more idealist than consumen, generally its easy to accept rumours than reality.
Although small amount, if this moved on continually, last finally will make other customer was curious and want to tried, after trying them would like and increased the awareness would real quality. Our community now begins so many smart to responded something, so do not only the perception but also the quality !
So the uniqueness of the world marketing. This is the location of "challenge" and "opportunity" . Please we test ourselves whereas that we experienced together.
When suddenly had the sensational news in Indonesia, for example the aircraft fell, what television broadcast that we will be watched before? METRO TV? , just the other? In fact in several last sensational news, I found that METRO TV not the first TV station covered this news. But when having the other sensational news, personally I continue to again tried METRO TV first!!! in fact I am unsatisfied when not yet this METRO TV. And this happened most to ourselves.
In our mind was buried that "METRO TV" was the fastest news channel , since the tsunami incident. So that’s "perceived quality". " In fact "real quality" were not always like that." Asked to ourselves: how to removed this "habit"? Really was difficult it seems, although enabled.
Except if having a sensational news where METRO TV completely blank or did not produce this news, was not very much but needed several times, then "perceive quality" this will be faded. But apparently this matter was not possible to happen. And definitely METRO TV will try to maintain their reputation as the fastest reporter in Indonesia.
myself did not find the method changed "perceive value" of METRO TV for this case. Any idea in relationship how to changed this "habit"?
Let's share it here. Thanks..... generally I agree that perceived quality more important than real quality.
Please we remembered again case of mizone. mizone also sold perceived quality that this drink could make the consumer be awakened full consentration. after that mizone collapsed because of being jumped by rumours of the preservative drink . The question is... its really the preservative drink like mizone dangerous. Pheww! Once more perceived quality won. and mizone collaps.
Now mizone appeared again with maxxibillities that together served perceived quality that could make the consumer be awakened 100% concentration. Waw! Continue to be able to rise again their market share . it was interesting real quality not touch on-touch on in the case mizone. True by drinking of mizone the concentration was awakened? What research that proved? This became the weak point that could be made use of by the competitor in the similar category that most could put forward real quality . Vitazone wanted to try possibly? don't attack perceived quality (preservatives) but real quality (really could make the concentration).
the good case could be seen in Pocari Sweat. At least real quality as the isotonic drink that could replace body fluids quickly was proven with several available researches. But whether true by drinking Pocari Sweat will be influential significantly? The seeker of the sulphur in the crater Semeru still strong without Pocari, he.. he.. hehehe…
Despite Pocari put forward real quality, but perceived quality that was communicated far more bigger the qualities intensity. according to me this is exact step. Because at least their real quality was available, although being exaggerated. So if wanting to have the similar product that wanted attacked, the rival's same product must could exceed real quality and perceived quality that Pocari made .
According to a book with the title I saw in gramedia 'all marketers are liars'. Weww, really? Basically, if wanting to lie, don't be abundant. Real quality also continued to be put forward please, but perceived quality must above.

All must know that previously had done something wrong one biggest war in the depths consumer goods in Indonesia, between Rinso from Unilever Vs So Klin from Wings group. If being that notice, So Klin just dismissed the new advertisement: So Klin cleaned 101 stains, this was caused overseas there, Rinso has gone out "cleaned 99 stains"... so it s just a matter of time to also in launched in Indonesia...but the Wings Group has stolen start to launching So Klin 101 cleaned the stain.
Question: if you are the marketer of So Klin... what would u do given the case above: stolen the start, overtook Rinso or was waiting until Rinso launched “ cleaned 99 stains”, to afterwards at the time of simultaneously bashed with So Klin cleaned 101 stains... or others ?
If I am the marketer So Klin, it must I have been will overtake Rinso, because with to pioneer the effect would more was felt especially for the Indonesian market than only to follower although we state that So Klin cleaned 101 stains whereas Rinso only 99 stains.
Another thing that was questioned about Tide, new detergent from P&G, there are those that knew the development of this product in the market, because as we know this Tide was detergent no 1 in America, but in Indonesian P&G did not undertake the incessant marketing, in fact did not have his advertisement completely. Immediately after Tide circulated in the market, KAO at once issued Attack Color just, but also Unilever issued Rinso Excell, will Tide remain?
Why attacked it only in the image? Must also was innovation the product. For example uptil now detergent, softly and the fragrance was separated, why was not combined then? If could not all of them, yes the cleaner and the softly. So we did not need to buy So Klin as the softly. Secondly, after that just entered the new product 3 in 1, as the cleaner, softly, and fragrance. Perhaps this was suitable for Rinso. Because So Klin will also produce So Klin Detergen and So klin softly in fact only So Klin fragrance then.
Considering penetrationi powdered detergent has been high. Almost 85% domestic used detergen. was still must be looked for by the new use. The other alternative was to create the good detergent also to wash the car. Unlike now the person is still very anxious if washed the car with detergent. This will have an opportunity to seize the Kit market and so on. Which was the big market. To Guaranteed price was definitely cheaper than Kit.
as the rumours because of early of the So Klin emergence 101 because in the other country Rinso already launched Rinso 99 and the difficult success with the theme, so before Preceded launching in Indonesia, So Klin Overtook first by making 101 that meaning could clean 101 stains of all the certain stains could be lost.. if being not wrong of look, the education has begun with view list of the stain in the So Klin package 101 that joined with the TV advertisement and billboard.
Only whether Rinso will respond with for the bigger number, it seems its impossible, usually Unilever most the allergy for the theme that resembled the other person, moreover so follower... Even apparently the detergent war will move to the front that more Premium in the category of concentrate Detergent, here has remained silent Kao Attack that more previously entered this category. And So Klin too late... it seems in the front of this category the war will be longer than the number 101 war.
Tide in Indonesia just only taste the water, soft launching, but soon or later apparently they will enter the biggest because the market was indeed big.. but P&G apparently would not the concentration there because of their business that more make money was the Pantene .
Concerning the Indonesians's habit that separated the washing for the machine and the hands, indeed that because of the character of the washing machine that only could for wash the heavy things like bed cover, Jeans, etc.... if the silk model, underwear etc., that with the hands washing, moreover the Coat must with dry clean...
The matter why has used detergent, continued to be given the fragrance and softly.. he he he.. (a little promotion) the softly that to material is still being good to be used and to be easy in iron whereas fragrance.. this is affair the marketer increased the expenses cost then....
Must the innovationof product. For example uptil now detergent, softly and fragrance was separated, why was not combined then? Possibly for us sound of funny, how come was detergent, there is softly, there is fragrance... but beforehand had the research... evidently need would softly/fragrance that was available, and so many...
the name our person was unsatisfied if only washed, apparently more comfort, if after washed, was soaked with fragrance/softly previously before being put in the sun to dry. There is also after being washed with the washing machine, still in washed again with the hands, there is also that said, if detergent so many foams, the sign could wash cleaner, thats why previously had had detergent to claim washed without many foams, the end of this product in Indonesia not the used and loss...
But, the needs that was because of having the problem. Then where is the problem? In detergent or their clothes? Let us hope not in fact did not have detergent to satisfied. more unclean, not softer in fact possibly like the chrispy / chip if being put in the sun to dry hot, not more fragrant because of the fragrant aroma detergent yawned. So the image of detergent that was built through the advertisement uptil now possibly over promise. But because of not having the choice of the other product that was better using detergent. So, if there is more good why did not move to the others product or brand?
As in the case of person washed with the washing machine. Why has been rolled how come still rolled by hand anymore? Because its a habit instinct hand rolled or because indeed results of washing in machine washing were more unsatisfactory. myself possibly including that was conventional. After being washed with the washing machine that of the same class Electrolux although continue to I was still checked to eliminate the stain and stain although already with Rinso Excell.
I agreed, even my friend to commented concerning this case... according to him, if Rinso went out with the version 99... not old afterwards was followed by So Klin with the version 101, for example the echo of his communication will have 2. but the profit will be in side with had perceptional benefit higher, in this case according him SoKlin 101... what do you think?
That became my question precisely why must use the figure 101 were free from the intention to block the Rinso campaign. Has The community known if the spot Kind of the amount 102 ( for example)? That meant to eliminate 99% stains Kind. And didn’t better like that has been said eliminated all of the stains crumps.
its only as though as.... In Fact, is it dangerous to used one brand for 2 different categories, the example of extreme, if mine the marketer of Uniliver, what is the danger if we launching detergent with the Lux brand, what the consumer will be confused or even did not have the effect?
Or arrived entered Toiletries with launching the floor cleaner with mint taste of Mentos brand... Because I saw the case of the ABC, their apparently so good with used the ABC from the brand of the battery stone till the Soy Sauce, if being not wrong to have been forecasted if this ABC brand would not survive because the product extention its too distance.
If I was the consumer, its up to you, the important product was good and branding each quite strong product although more consumer's self-confidence, still more passes again if brand more was generic, the ABC its generic isn’t it, difference if viagra made peppermints or detergent.
Yamaha could enter the musical instrument and the motor, why not? This is the problem of perception. Mean the perception about the brand that has adhered in mind the community. Frankly, myself just knew now (after read mail) if the ABC stone of the brand of battery with ABC soy sauce its one group with the same company. the matter my perception uptil now the ABC battery and ABC soy sauce did not have relations to one another. Moreover I thought the ABC battery and ABC soy sauce were two different companies that by chance with the same brand. What this because of the effect of the name of the generic brand ? The ABC, General, National, etc.??
So my Opinion.. don't distinguish the category... but continue to in the same core for example samsung to the electronic device, LG to electronics. But I was asked about it. As honest a little hesitant because of being compatible with the principle of the "focus" in Al ries style. Do you remembered Yamaha, what’s them? Afterwards remembered samsung what’s them? The washing machine, TV? The mobile phone? Or what?
If according to the expert Brand the Aaker, if you want to did brand extension and the success, the condition only 2:

1. this brand has been perception with the good quality.
2. complimentary effect in a sense category of the product that became the target extension complemented each other with the category of the beginning product for example toothpaste pepsodent did extension to the toothbrush, or soap lifebuoy to shampoo that complemented each other for the affair bathed.

Indeed in several articles aaker often was proven, and this in a manner indirectly with the example of common sense also often was supported by Al Ries with immutable laws of branding, especially for the ABC, apparently this hypothesis was unproven, but back to the question, how far we saw the survivor of the ABC, if could remain the significant theory of the expert in the marketing could be broken.
For the ABC case, that only one example of the success 1 brand for several categories of product, & could not be made the example to other brand was not so strong, brand ABC has been the tradition & was rooted on the consumer's mind.
My question is (in connection with the book of Aaker). How if the case like this: (for example) PT XYZ initially issued XYZ brand toothpaste, continued the product sold out and really was known. Even their time issued several variants of the taste / the benefit from this toothpaste, the community still really liked (the sale still good). So if the person said XYZ then their remembered this toothpaste. (Brand awareness XYZ has been very strong).
Then one day went out a new policy from the boss of PT XYZ that wanted to issue the other product (for example) perfume. And the XYZ brand will be made corporate brand (In Other Words did not have again XYZ brand toothpaste, available brand toothpaste 123, 456, etc. from PT. XYZ), the question, will the community become confused or not? (with this change, let us hope not later even it was thought XYZ toothpaste immitation ). and how if later PT XYZ will be still issuing the perfume? Made again confused or not?
Still relation with the matter above that the possibility must be discussed, why there is company wanted to used the same brand for the different product? What cheaper? Easier or what? What the difference to using one brand just at the same time. Certainly had the surplus and lack.
maybe the surplus certainly brand recognition, the person has memorised the name, and if the brand had the good reputation, with the hope this reputation can transferred to the new product and this new product was given the same name.
the lack of certainly if the quality from this new product evidently did not have the same quality as the product beforehand, then reputation that good earlier for the origin product could take part in being eroded or being completely lost.
And the dangerous, where ?
The example of the case that too much was not similar but had the characteristics were same from this brand shifting ,

in quoted from New York Times on September 8 2003, KODAK Switches to Business Focus, was discussed that because of the digital threat KODAK photography now tries shift line they product from the consumer of photography to new fields as written this:
"Kodak formed four other groups: health imaging; commercial printing, which makes equipment for use in graphic arts; commercial imaging, which sells storage devices and services; and display and components, which makes sensors and displays used in cameras and car radios. "

In fact they did not have the experience and the reputation beforehand as the provider of this product and service and they will be faced with the player who has been rooted in this industry like the HP or GE.
The KODAK was not associated with the other service apart from photography in the USA , they were very famous with the communication used the slogan of "The KODAK Moment". But Whether the power? From now onKODAK must replace their communication that they not only the provider's company of the photography product but must be attracted to the other side that KODAK had the reputation as company that gave the best solution anything the service that their given. In this case according to KODAK, this change not the choice but must be done.
So this is not the same brand for 2 different categories but the same brand for the new category.
For the KODAK case, they also had strongly Brand & their new toy still not too far from the length toy, in the IT category.
About Yamaha, like also company Japan generally tended to use the name founder as Brand, the proven was successful also in the musical instrument even Water Purifier. The Others such as Mitsubishi also played in the Elevator, Kawasaki in the heavy implement, the aircraft, the tanker even the satellite, Honda played also in Robotic.
But for new cases, apparently rarely to heard? Even tended for the similar category product, to be made second brand...
And regarding to use of the same name in 2 difference categories this is usually caused the company did not have the budget more to promoted new brand, then used the one of brand that already exist. So if you were in my position like this, so how? Continue to remain to launching with the same brand or waiting if later had the money...
So if I in this position I will choose the one brand for one category then. its Busy in the next period if positioning was increasingly conical.
Possibly in the same category wanted to be brought to 17-25, that one wanted to be brought to 35+ will not be possible to join in. difference language , difference communication. Now possibly was not felt but we did not know the development in the future, whereas investment for constructive the road brand continued.
usually the company hard-working to register their product as trademark although the production not yet to move, in fact launching possibly sometime. This one to save time launching because if being not wrong register trademark this product will eat the long time .
About waiting for if have money or have budget, it would be better if really serious and wanted support some brand with the reasonable budget, just launching of product, if the only half of brand (its poorly) like the stepchild, lived not, support also not, maybe only the agent to happy :)
in a manner the theory, its realistic that often decisions like this happened because of truth factors or the logical requirement when that. So we had not known in fact why A like this, while B like that and all of them just very legal.
From that I heard , one of the important matters in decide to used the same brand for 2 different categories was to consider the attribute from that brand personally. Brand, as we known, had the brand association certain (that not only one, occasionally many). And must become attention for marketer to consider which attributes to keep? And which attributes to delete? For example lifebouy. Soap lifebouy had the attribute: soap anti germs, the family's soap.
when to launched shampoo, lifebouy to maintained the attribute of family, and eliminated the attribute anti germs. Could be seen from the advertisement and marketing communication shampoo lifebouy this clearly was seen that shampoo for all the family. (the advertisement, must have the mother, the child, and the father hair was good and bla - bla - bla because used shampoo lifebouy).
According me, lifebouy exactly chose the attribute that must be maintained and whatever that their disposed. could be imagined if maintained was the attribute anti germs. for example: shampoo anti lice... :) not necessarily lifebouy shampoo could be successful as now.
The other example was Gillete. As we known, the association that adhered to Gillete was: razor technology (shaving technology), and Man. and we knew possibly all the men knew the good shaver for them was Gillete. But Gillete failed total during launched Gillete for the Women. As honest in this case, I did not understand whether Gillete chose badly attribute which must they maintained or because of attribute of the man who clung to Gillete very strong? So as when they left this attribute, precisely to blunder for this brand.

In relation with the subject above about the logo for one company could be same as holding company ? Indeed could by a little frase. for example from the logo BiNus, available BiNus Center, BiNus Career, the University BiNus, BiNus High etc..
Indeed had several strategies branding in part:

• Product branding - one brand name was used exclusive for one product then.
• Line branding - one brand name for the main product that was used also for products complimentary.
• Range branding - one brand name for some product range.
• Umbrella branding - one brand name (most names of the company) was used for all the product ( Sony )
• Share branding or two tier branding - brand name and company name was used simultaneously ( Honda Accord )

So the logo one company same as the logo holding happened when company that used the strategy umbrella branding.

• The profit : economic of scale from the side communication, each product contributes against overall brand equity, entered the new market more was easy.
• The loss : Poor umbrella will become the hindrance for the introduction to a new product, when the product just failed all the other product was affected by latex, the consumer became confused concerning the identity and positioning this company (diluted).

The logo for each one brand always difference, but each of view promo must have their logo holding company.

• should not forget that BII substituted the logo, simply and not not as the change in the point of view and the bank's mission.
• When the same logo or almost be the same as holding company, when group holding company at one time experienced the decline, this will definitely affect the image in subsidiary company (group the company/the subsidiary company), BII possibly for example just small where being gotten by credit stalled in the Sinar Mas Group at that time so as the image/the community's belief in BII at that time increasingly descended that finally had experienced the restructuring of banking was supervised by BPPN.
• BiNus had the logo almost same was caused BiNus that was other was the work part/the division/the service from BiNus that personally not company just so as to continue to use the parent logo, despite few changes then.
• Maybe this had few discourses about the Study of the Logo was taken from the "Creativity & Visual Communication the" III Th" edition. In October. 2002 by Leonardo Widya, S.Sn.

I Was thought the problem of use corporate logo or brand to an individual brand that was spent by the company really will depend in as strong to make or the logo corporate this brand .
If corporate brand indeed had equities so strong, precisely that will benefit with leverage the equity available in corporate brand, but if corporate brand was not strong enough, not better constructive individual brand? Clearly their respective had the bad impact but also the good impact like that has been written by the other.
But if we saw the available condition, especially for the company in the service field, then tended more make use of corporate brand, for example the hospital that everywhere always relied corporate brand because of the characteristics intangiblity that made us rather was difficult to try if compared with consumer goods.
The other example such as the bank, see it, how each certain banking product being same with corporate brand, for example to klick BCA, BII Syariah, BritAma etc..
Moreover had several reconciliation books that could be read as our reference, in part:

• David A Aker - Building Strong Brand.
• Tom Duncan - IMC, Using Advertising & Promotion to Build Brands.
• Helen Vaid - Brand Strategy, Design & Implementation of Corporate & Product Identity.

Still was related the problem branding, also you could be read the book that title: "The 22 of Immutable Laws of Branding: How to Build a Product or Service into a World-Class Brand Penulis": Al Ries and Laura Ries, the explanation was very clear, and always (as I remember) was accompanied by the example brand failed and was successful. Also could order in Amazon.com